Monthly Archives: February 2010

It seems inevitable

Just enough of my persistent-not-exactly-optimism is left that I won’t say it is inevitable… but damn does it seem it.

It seems inevitable that whenever I have a day of wow-I-totally-get-this-parenting-thing, look-at-me-be-zen-about-his-tantrums, damn-dude-why-can’t-you-just-let-it-go-like-I’m-doing, the next day — the very next day — I completely fucking lose it. Break-a-plate-in-anger-when-he-dumps-out-the-eggs-he-doesn’t-want lose it.

I don’t like it. Maybe the zen days aren’t worth it, if this is the price.

*******

In other news, The Man has been fixing the bloggityblog up, even as I’ve been trashing our real life home. Raising My Boychick now has a mobile site, the Archives show an accurate post count (instead of including the glossary not-really-posts), Popular Posts is back, and all the old post internal links back to blogspot have been replaced with RMB links. So yay him.

*******

In other other news, today is — was — my nephew-I-haven’t-even-met-yet’s 2nd birthday, and I am a shit aunt and a shit sister and a shit sister-in-law because I have done nothing about it, except remember at a time when I couldn’t call and spend the rest of the day beating myself up about it.

*******

That is all.

NPFP Guest Post: Marriage, Redefined

Welcome to RMB’s Naked Pictures of Faceless People, a series of guest posts from diverse anonymous bloggers. (Read more about NPFP’s origins.) These are the posts that are jumping to get out of us, but for whatever reason — safety, embarrassment, conflict of interest, protection of loved ones’ reputations or feelings, or so on — we don’t or won’t or can’t post at our own blogs. Anyone is welcome to submit or discuss a potential post by emailing me at arwyn at raisingmyboychick dot com.

Marriage, Redefined

As far as anyone can tell, we are a typical family.

We’re a middle class couple living in the suburbs with three kids. He drives a sedan, I a minivan. He has a white collar job, I stay at home. Our children would best be described as well-adjusted, bright and happy. We volunteer at the school, around the neighborhood, in our community. By exterior appearances alone, we are normal to the point of boring.

But everyone has a secret, do they not?

Ours is that we have an open marriage. And it works, too. In fact, I would argue that it works better than if we were monogamous.

We weren’t always so non-traditional. We were high school sweethearts, and for the first several years of our relationship, I was completely opposed to anything other than the norm: two people together, and that should be enough. Anything beyond fantasizing about a movie star was strictly off limits. I believed a lot of the misinformation out there about open marriages: The only person who benefits is the man, the woman only does it to make her partner happy and/or try to save the marriage, and it will surely – beyond a doubt – destroy your relationship.

So far, I’ve found none of these things to be true.

I was the one who brought up the idea of swinging – the term that best fits our marital lifestyle – eight years ago. I had always been curious about women, and thought I might be bisexual, but had never had the opportunity to have an experience with another female before becoming a wife and mother. My partner certainly wasn’t opposed to the idea, and was willing to let me try this on my own if that was more comfortable for me.

But I wanted it to be our experience, as a couple. We found just the right person – a long time friend of ours who has been in a successful open marriage for years – and had a great time. It wasn’t awkward, it didn’t put stress on our relationship, and it seemed to emphasize our strengths: Trust, honesty and communication. Without those, we couldn’t sleep with other people. However, without those, I wouldn’t want to anyway. Feeling secure and loved is essential in any marriage, but especially in an open one.

So, why do we do it? I don’t do it to please him, nor he to please me, or to save a marriage that needs no saving. We love each tremendously, and agree that if either of us ever wants to go back to a monogamous lifestyle, we’ll do it without question.

We look swinging as an extension of our already amazing sex life. Bringing other people into the bedroom on occasion (and those occasions are fairly rare due to how busy our lives are and because we don’t often go out looking for new opportunities) is, to us, a lot like using sex toys, watching porn, or telling each other fantasies. It’s another way to spice things up and share something new and exciting together. I have had the opportunity to sleep with a few other people without my husband present, but I much prefer to have him there. We both agree, however, that having the option be intimate without the other spouse – after clearing it with the other person first, of course – feels liberating, even if seldom used.

I don’t think we’re any better or worse than other couples because we have an open relationship, nor do I believe this is a lifestyle that would suit everyone. However, in an age where the divorce rate is sky high and people are feeling more disconnected from each other than ever, maybe we need to be more open-minded about our definition of marriage.

——————————-

Please support the Naked Pictures of Faceless People project by commenting on the posts. Comments which attempt to guess the identity or any aspect of the identity of the blogger will be deleted, however. Protect and respect this space as though it were your own work on display here, naked and faceless.

Anonymous comments are welcome on NPFP posts. Simply put “Anonymous” or any pseudonym in Name, and either your own or a fake email addresses (ex me@me.com) as the email. NOTE: If you have a Gravatar associated with your email address, it will show up even with an anonymous name! In which case please use a different or a fake email address.

Eat or die

That, of course, is the first rule of nutrition. And there are no other rules.

I just read this fabulous post over at Spilt Milk: Let us eat cake, and in the comments, in my own rambling, I had something of a revelation, immediately followed by a reality check:

I said that the Boychick never “doesn’t like” what we have for dinner, and then joked that I’d regret saying that later. But then it occurred to me — it is often the case that he doesn’t eat what we have for dinner. Or rather, he’ll eat only part of it (say, only the broccoli, or everything but the broccoli — don’t ask me!), or will eat only a very little bit of it, or, very very infrequently, will decline to eat with us at all (which on the two or three occasions that’s happened has been more about him wanting to run and play right then than a commentary on the meal itself).

And my revelation was that some parents might frame that as “not liking” what we served. Because he’s not eating it. Or because, tonight, unlike the three hundred nights that preceded it, he says he doesn’t like noodles. Or broccoli. Or chicken. Or whatever it is he’s declining to consume on this particular night.

But never, not once, has it crossed my mind to conclude that, thus, he “doesn’t like” what we made. Because I know that toddler tastes change by the day — sometimes by the minute. Because I know that his choice to not eat something right then doesn’t say anything about whether he’ll like it at some other time. Because I know that he ate it yesterday, and even if not, he’ll probably eat it tomorrow1.

But mostly because we trust him. We trust that he’ll eat what he wants, and how much he wants, when he wants. It’s how we fed him as an infant — as much breastmilk as he wanted whenever he wanted, in which he got tastes of everything I ate — and it’s how we introduced solids2 — whole foods, the same foods we were eating — and it’s how he eats now. He eats spicy black beans and chicken makhani and mushroom stroganoff and pretty much whatever we eat. Except for when he doesn’t. Which is ok, because he’ll eat something else later.

The reality check is that there is absolutely privilege in this: we completely have the first rule of nutrition covered. If he doesn’t eat what’s on his plate right now, no one’s going to starve. No one’s going to go hungry because he wasn’t interested in that food right then. There will always be plenty more food later, and different food, and enough food to fill him up, and enough food to waste.

And that is not true for everyone all the time. That is not true for many people within just miles of me. That may not be true for all the people reading this.

Which is something we need to remember — I need to remember — when extolling the virtues and joys of unconstrained living, of intuitive eating, of whatever privileged philosophy3 is being promoted that day. Some of us simply do not have those options. Some of us must make our children eat whatever is in front of them right then because who knows when or what the next meal will be.

Sometimes, it is eat this — or die.

  1. Even zucchini, which for quite a while was the one food we knew he would consistently decline. Until the night he ate it and wanted more.
  2. Mostly. In retrospect, we could have eased up on avoiding the “allergen” foods a bit earlier, but according to mainstream America, we were already neglectfully blasé about the whole thing, what with letting him eat off our plates, even if we did pick the nuts out first.
  3. Yes, even when it is a social justice philosophy, intended to work against fatphobia and sexism and age oppression. Because this is how kyriarchy and intersectionalism work: privilege in some areas can shield us from the worst of oppression in others, or can give us the ability to negate the effects some. Under capitalism, money makes up for much.

NPFP Guest Post: It’s Never Simple

Welcome to RMB’s Naked Pictures of Faceless People, a series of guest posts from diverse anonymous bloggers. (Read more about NPFP’s origins.) These are the posts that are jumping to get out of us, but for whatever reason — safety, embarrassment, conflict of interest, protection of loved ones’ reputations or feelings, or so on — we don’t or won’t or can’t post at our own blogs. Anyone is welcome to submit or discuss a potential post by emailing me at arwyn at raisingmyboychick dot com.

TRIGGER WARNING There is a trigger warning on this post for quotes of abusive language and descriptions of abuse. Please do not read if doing so would put your own health or sanity in jeopardy.

It’s Never Simple

There was a little girl, who had a little curl, right in the middle of her forehead. When she was good, she was very, very good. But when she was bad, she was horrid. –Nursery rhyme by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow.

It’s never simple.

Him picking me up and carrying me around for a whole minute when his sports team won. Sat out with neighbors on the front lawn having beer and wine and watching the sun go down, smiling, joking. Having a barbecue in the back yard listening to music and dancing with each other until it grew dark.

Him not speaking to me for two weeks for being five minutes late back one night. Me sleeping in the second bedroom crying myself to sleep. Pleading with him, sobbing, for him to forgive me. Him, shouting at me as I cried, insults getting worse and worse the more I sobbed. Literally getting on my knees and asking him not to dump me. Desperation rising. The relief when finally he said he would, but I’d have to work really hard now. Me, thanking him. The pain in my eyes the next morning from the sobbing.

We sat cuddled up on the couch watching episodes of Star Trek: DS9 every night. We’d go to the bar and chat and smile over beers. We’d go to bed and I’d lie behind him with my arm curling around him, lazily thumbing the curly hairs on his chest. He came back from work every now and again having been to the store and bought me a Doctor Who DVD. I once walked two miles carrying a box of heavy glass dinner plates because I remembered him talking about how much he loved the square plates at his friends’ house.

You stupid, fat bitch, he said. You lazy, stupid fat bitch. You’ve been in your bathrobe all day and you’ve done fucking nothing around here.
I have! I’ve done the dishes, and the baby was crying so much I couldn’t put him down to do anything else.
I thought you were getting a sling to solve all those problems, but no, it’s just more money you’ve spent on hippie bullshit.

That’s not fair, I have been doing some things, it’s just that I can’t do everything yet, I will be able to, give me time!
You’re a stupid, fat, ugly lazy bitch. You’re useless. Absolutely fucking useless. Thoughtless. Selfish. You don’t give a shit about me. It’s always about you, and what you can and can’t do.
What about my needs?

We reminisced about the parties we used to go to, the clubs, or sometimes staying in to take ecstasy together, talking about everything and nothing except how much we loved each other, opening up our innermost thoughts and secrets. We remembered, or didn’t remember, what we’d done before the baby. We joked about the time he threw up in front of a cop in the middle of the city while he’d been coming up; we laughed about the time I wrote down the deep and meaningful thoughts I had on acid, which turned out to be garbage the next day.

We glossed over the fact that he’d take advantage of how loved-up I was on a pill, get me to dress up in too-tight underwear that hurt my drug-sensitive skin, get me to fuck him when I just wanted to sit and chat or dance, how in clubs he’d always make me go up to men to flirt with them to get more pills when we’d run out.

When I had morning sickness in the early days of my pregnancy, he’d cook me a healthy meal every night with lots of vegetables – “even if you just keep some down, at least it’s nutrients”. He wanted to keep the pregnancy test with the “positive” result because of how happy he was. He got his friend to come over to decorate the second bedroom as a nursery for the new baby.

You’ll have to be induced.
You know I don’t want to be. There’s no good reason, except that I’m two weeks “overdue”. They can monitor me every other day to be on the safe side.
And who’s going to drive you to the hospital then? I won’t. And besides, I want to be able to tell my boss when I can take my paternity leave. You’ll just have to be induced.

He’d sit with the new baby on his knee. The baby would lie on his knees, tiny little thing. He’d hold his hands and make him do pretend boxing. He’d smile like every doting father. He extended his paternity leave to three weeks by taking vacation just so he could spend more time with us. He was upset when it finished.

When the baby was just six weeks old he wouldn’t even speak to me he was so angry. Angry that he thought I had Post Partum Depression and this was why the house was a mess. Angry that this constantly crying baby would stop crying if I’d just give in and give him a bottle. Angry that I was using the baby’s crying as an “excuse” not to keep the house tidy and iron his shirts. Angry that I was still eating as much as I ate when I was pregnant. He was so angry and quiet that I went to stay with a friend. He said he’d only have me back if I took anti-depressants, made efforts to lose the baby weight and gave the baby at least one bottle a day.

When I came close to a breakdown after working outside the home full time for a year (not my choice but his), he was utterly supportive of me working part-time. He helped me with the job application. He didn’t say a word about me not earning. He came home from work every day and asked how my day had been. He made me a special meal when I got my new job.

I would sleep with you, but I can’t get used to your new shape, it’s a lot to get used to when you consider how slim you were when we first met. And I wish you made more of an effort. You just expect me to be overcome with lust when you dress like a scruffy Mom, with your short hair, no makeup, and how you go bra-free, not that it’s your fault they’re saggy but you could at least wear a bra when we’re having sex.

And this was the cycle of it; he would be: happy, kind, nice for ages, then a bit cool, which always made me fear I’d done something wrong, really cool and quiet, ignoring me, then when I asked him what was wrong, because I couldn’t bear being ignored, he’d get angry, really, really angry, with hateful, hurtful, nasty words and the occasional glass of water thrown over me (but never physical violence), always laughing and getting worse when I cried, always trying to anger me to the point where I’d say something nasty to him in return, so then he could be utterly justified in the things he said to me. Then eventually forgiveness (because it was always me who was wrong) and even happy, and kind. And the nice, nice, nice bit would go on for a long, long time, sometimes months, once or twice close to a year. I’d think things had changed.

And I was frightened. Frightened of becoming a single mother (it’s hard, but not the end of the world by any stretch of the imagination). Frightened he’d do something to try and take my baby from me (I was right on that score, initially). Frightened I’d lose our joint friends (I did), frightened I wouldn’t be able to cope on my own (I can, and better), frightened of what people would think, frightened that no one would believe me (at least one friend didn’t; hey, after all, he never hit me so it wasn’t abuse, right?), frightened of telling him it was over and what he’d say. I was frightened people would think me a fool for not leaving earlier (do you?), for letting him talk to me like that, or a bad mother for letting my baby stay in that situation.

I was frightened of telling people, too. Because I thought they’d tell me to leave him. Because they wouldn’t understand that he was only like this very occasionally. Because I thought if I told them, and then didn’t leave, they’d say it was my fault. But I didn’t want to be told to leave him. I wanted to be told how to make him stop being like this. No one ever managed to tell me that.

In the end, I didn’t leave for a long time. But I did, eventually. And life carries on. I still see him; we’re still on speaking terms; friendly, even, to a point. I no longer think things have changed. I’m not naive and I know at any moment he could turn. But for the sake of our child I am friendly, even nice to him. I even have a laugh and a joke with him occasionally. You might think I should be fighting him in the courts for full custody; how can I let my child be raised by such a monster? You might think I’m lucky that he even sees his child; many don’t.

But it’s never simple.

——————————-

Please support the Naked Pictures of Faceless People project by commenting on the posts. Comments which attempt to guess the identity or any aspect of the identity of the blogger will be deleted, however. Protect and respect this space as though it were your own work on display here, naked and faceless.

Anonymous comments are welcome on NPFP posts. Simply put “Anonymous” or any pseudonym in Name, and either your own or a fake email addresses (ex me@me.com) as the email. NOTE: If you have a Gravatar associated with your email address, it will show up even with an anonymous name! In which case please use a different or a fake email address.

On identity and “who [I] bone”

Sexual identity? Does not actually come from “who you fuck”.  See, this is one of those misconceptions which lead to all sorts of misunderstandings, from backing up the assertion that “everyone is bi” (because so many people have had sexual contact with more than one gender) to dismissing sexual identities altogether.

Like in this oh so lovely comment (doomed to forever remain an unpublished reply to Why I loathe “Everyone’s bi”):

We’re being told that our identities — who we are, in a real, fundamental way — are false.

Who you bone is not who you are.

If you define yourself by who you fuck, well, that’s kind of sad to me.

I define who I am by a lot broader criteria than who’s genitals touch my genitals.

…really. Who I bone (nice heteronormative phrase, there, by the way) is not who I am? I never would have guessed. I always thought I was The-Man-sexual, since I’ve only ever had sex with one person other than myself. Or perhaps I am, as Recursive Paradox says, vibesexual (shout out to Good Vibrations and It’s My Pleasure). Or, mostly, digisexual (hat tip to Lucy). Bisexual? Well, I’ve never had sex with a woman, so I certainly can’t be that.

…oh wait.

Because that wasn’t actually what I was saying. Y’know, what with pointing out that monogamy and bisexuality (or other nonmonosexualities) are not, contrary to popular belief, incompatible. For that matter, neither are celibacy and bisexuality. Or a history of sex with multiple genders and monosexuality. Because who we bone, as the commenter said, is not, in fact, who we are.

But our sexual identity? Yeah, that is sort of who we are. It surely feels fundamental to me: like a limb1, or a layer of fascia that twines around everything inside me and holds me together. It feels as bound with myself as my bones, my flesh, my fat, my skin — or my humanity, my womanhood, my age.

Except, apparently, I am denying those parts of myself when I proclaim my bisexuality. I am not, according to the above commenter, also bipolar, or fat, or white, or a mother, or a sister, or a daughter, or a lover, or a writer, or a blogger, or a student, or a knitter, or kind, or compassionate, or passionate, or opinionated, or any of the multitude of other aspects of my self which I’ve talked about, here and elsewhere. No, apparently by asserting my sexual identity, by saying it is fundamental to who I am, I am reducing the whole of my self to this one aspect of me. And if I don’t want some random internet douche to interpret assertions of my sexual orientation that way, then I should damn well shut my mouth.

And become invisible. Again. Still. Always.

But that’s not marginalization or oppression, oh no. That’s just being more evolved, because who needs sexual identity? For that matter, who needs race, really — we should all be colorblind. And gender? The so-evolved all know that’s just a social construct.

Each of these arguments is achingly familiar to those of us who have been erased — who have had those arguments used against us — by oppressive communities. “You’re not bisexual; it’s silly to define yourself by “who you fuck”, I don’t care who you sleep with, just don’t tell me about it, don’t ask for “special rights” because of it. I don’t need to acknowledge the ways in which you have historically and systematically been oppressed because of your race — we’ve moved past that, can’t you angry “minority” types stop playing “the race card” all the time? Gender isn’t real: you’re just “a man in a dress”, and that’s all you’ll ever be, you’ll never know what it’s like to really be a woman.”

This is hate speech, y’all. This excuses murder, and assault, and abuse, and a hundred smaller, subtler forms of oppression. This is how we are told not to find each other, not to stand in solidarity, not to work together to dismantle the oppressions we face — so that we can be picked off one by one for the very identities we’re told aren’t real.

So I say no. I say there’s a lot more — and a lot less — to identities than popularly conceived of. There’s a lot more value, a lot more depth, a lot more nuance — and a lot less checklists and gatekeepers and policing. Identity, especially a nonmonosexual identity, is highly complex, and breathtakingly simple. It’s not about who I bone, and it’s not for you to define for me. It is about who I want and what I feel, and it is for me to declare, if I so choose.

And I? I so choose.

I am bisexual/queer/pan/nonmonosexual/not-even-slightly-straight. And it matters.

  1. I’m increasingly uncomfortable with the loss-of-limb analogy, because those who are born without or lose a limb are not any less themselves for having that particular body configuration, and I have a strong suspicion — ok, I’m pretty certain — using this analogy is a form of ableism.
Private